https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35953 Rule 52 of Schedule II to the Income-tax Act required a proclamation of intended sale of immovable property for tax recovery to be published in the language of the district, so that local residents could learn of the auction and the property could secure a proper price. Because the proclamation was not issued in Kannada, the statutory requirement was not satisfied and the sale proceedings could not be acted upon on that basis. The existing notice did not require quashing merely because the sale date had passed, but a fresh proclamation in Kannada was necessary before any further sale action could proceed. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:41:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35953 Rule 52 of Schedule II to the Income-tax Act required a proclamation of intended sale of immovable property for tax recovery to be published in the language of the district, so that local residents could learn of the auction and the property could secure a proper price. Because the proclamation was not issued in Kannada, the statutory requirement was not satisfied and the sale proceedings could not be acted upon on that basis. The existing notice did not require quashing merely because the sale date had passed, but a fresh proclamation in Kannada was necessary before any further sale action could proceed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 01 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35953