<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35952</link>
    <description>The court held that even if deductions were not claimed in the return, if necessary particulars were on record, the ITO should consider and allow the claim. The absence of a formal claim should not prevent the ITO from granting a deduction if relevant material exists. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of material on record to support a claim and granted costs to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:39:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35952</link>
      <description>The court held that even if deductions were not claimed in the return, if necessary particulars were on record, the ITO should consider and allow the claim. The absence of a formal claim should not prevent the ITO from granting a deduction if relevant material exists. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of material on record to support a claim and granted costs to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>