<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1218 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450067</link>
    <description>The commentary addresses eligibility under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme where inquiry, audit or investigation was pending and tax liability was quantified by written communication. It explains that written quantification may emanate from the taxpayer if it forms part of the record and is not a unilateral disputed assertion; such communication constituted an admission of liability for the purposes of scheme quantification, leading to entitlement to scheme relief. A summary rejection without hearing infringes natural justice; the declaration must be reconsidered, an opportunity of hearing afforded, and a speaking order issued granting consequential relief if quantification stands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1218 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450067</link>
      <description>The commentary addresses eligibility under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme where inquiry, audit or investigation was pending and tax liability was quantified by written communication. It explains that written quantification may emanate from the taxpayer if it forms part of the record and is not a unilateral disputed assertion; such communication constituted an admission of liability for the purposes of scheme quantification, leading to entitlement to scheme relief. A summary rejection without hearing infringes natural justice; the declaration must be reconsidered, an opportunity of hearing afforded, and a speaking order issued granting consequential relief if quantification stands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>