<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450065</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the review petitions challenging the previous judgment on FL3 licensees&#039; liability for interest on delayed turnover tax payments during the Covid lockdown. The Court found no error justifying a review, emphasizing the limited scope of review jurisdiction. The initial judgment, which required adherence to tax obligations, was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450065</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the review petitions challenging the previous judgment on FL3 licensees&#039; liability for interest on delayed turnover tax payments during the Covid lockdown. The Court found no error justifying a review, emphasizing the limited scope of review jurisdiction. The initial judgment, which required adherence to tax obligations, was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>