https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312589 The SC held that land ceased to be evacuee property after notification under Section 12 of the DPCR Act, vesting it in the Central Government and creating a common pool for displaced persons. The exemption clause in the Land Acquisition Act notification excluding evacuee land therefore did not apply. The Court ruled that despite Central Government ownership, an encumbrance was created through provisional possession to auction purchasers, which could be acquired under the LA Act. The HC judgment was set aside and appeal allowed. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:11:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312589 The SC held that land ceased to be evacuee property after notification under Section 12 of the DPCR Act, vesting it in the Central Government and creating a common pool for displaced persons. The exemption clause in the Land Acquisition Act notification excluding evacuee land therefore did not apply. The Court ruled that despite Central Government ownership, an encumbrance was created through provisional possession to auction purchasers, which could be acquired under the LA Act. The HC judgment was set aside and appeal allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312589