https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312582 The appeal was dismissed, with the Ct. holding that the appellants' rights were not protected under the 1954 Act as they lost possession before the notification. The Custodian General's jurisdiction was nullified by the 1954 Act, granting exclusive authority to managing officers or corporations to handle property post-acquisition. No order as to costs was made, considering the Custodian General's delay contributed to the situation. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:19:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312582 The appeal was dismissed, with the Ct. holding that the appellants' rights were not protected under the 1954 Act as they lost possession before the notification. The Custodian General's jurisdiction was nullified by the 1954 Act, granting exclusive authority to managing officers or corporations to handle property post-acquisition. No order as to costs was made, considering the Custodian General's delay contributed to the situation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312582