<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 75 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312581</link>
    <description>The court concluded that an auction purchaser of evacuee property, lacking a sale certificate but with tenant attornment, can maintain an ejectment suit under ordinary law. The Delhi Rent Control Act is inapplicable as ownership remains with the Government, thus ordinary law governs. Tenant attornment establishes a landlord-tenant relationship, enabling the purchaser to enforce tenancy rights, including eviction for breaches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 75 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312581</link>
      <description>The court concluded that an auction purchaser of evacuee property, lacking a sale certificate but with tenant attornment, can maintain an ejectment suit under ordinary law. The Delhi Rent Control Act is inapplicable as ownership remains with the Government, thus ordinary law governs. Tenant attornment establishes a landlord-tenant relationship, enabling the purchaser to enforce tenancy rights, including eviction for breaches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>