https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580 Approval of the highest bid in an evacuee-property auction and grant of provisional possession created a binding contractual and possessory interest, amounting to an encumbrance or at least a private interest. That interest did not bar acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, even though formal legal title had not yet passed. The acquisition was also not invalid on the ground that title had not vested in the auction purchaser on the date of the notification, because title under the compensation-pool sale would pass only on full payment and completion by sale certificate, which had not occurred at that time. The acquisition notification and proceedings were upheld, while independent monetary claims were left to be decided separately. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:57:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580 Approval of the highest bid in an evacuee-property auction and grant of provisional possession created a binding contractual and possessory interest, amounting to an encumbrance or at least a private interest. That interest did not bar acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, even though formal legal title had not yet passed. The acquisition was also not invalid on the ground that title had not vested in the auction purchaser on the date of the notification, because title under the compensation-pool sale would pass only on full payment and completion by sale certificate, which had not occurred at that time. The acquisition notification and proceedings were upheld, while independent monetary claims were left to be decided separately. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580