<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1058 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the decision of the Division Bench of the Delhi HC, reversing the Single Judge&#039;s order that quashed the acquisition notification. The court determined that the land could be acquired under the LA Act due to an encumbrance created in 1960. The appeal was dismissed without costs, but the appellant&#039;s compensation claims would be considered separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1058 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the decision of the Division Bench of the Delhi HC, reversing the Single Judge&#039;s order that quashed the acquisition notification. The court determined that the land could be acquired under the LA Act due to an encumbrance created in 1960. The appeal was dismissed without costs, but the appellant&#039;s compensation claims would be considered separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>