https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312579 A claim that land was evacuee property failed because the statutory requirements for declaration, notification and vesting under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act were not proved. Mere assertions, disputed correspondence and inconsistent descriptions were insufficient to establish Government title. As the Government did not prove lawful vesting or ownership, it also lacked locus to proceed under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. The Special Court's basis for treating the respondents as land grabbers therefore fell away, and the common order was not interfered with. en-us Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:32:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312579 A claim that land was evacuee property failed because the statutory requirements for declaration, notification and vesting under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act were not proved. Mere assertions, disputed correspondence and inconsistent descriptions were insufficient to establish Government title. As the Government did not prove lawful vesting or ownership, it also lacked locus to proceed under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. The Special Court's basis for treating the respondents as land grabbers therefore fell away, and the common order was not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312579