<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court rules 200% penalty u/s 129 unwarranted for brief e-way bill delay in export to Bangladesh.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75197</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to evade tax - expiration of the e-way bill - exported to Bangladesh - On the date and time when the vehicle was intercepted, the vehicle did not have a valid e-way bill - The High Court concluded that the circumstances did not warrant a 200% penalty imposition, considering the short delay and the absence of evidence of intent to contravene the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:43:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court rules 200% penalty u/s 129 unwarranted for brief e-way bill delay in export to Bangladesh.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75197</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty of 200% u/s 129 - Bonafide belief - intention to evade tax - expiration of the e-way bill - exported to Bangladesh - On the date and time when the vehicle was intercepted, the vehicle did not have a valid e-way bill - The High Court concluded that the circumstances did not warrant a 200% penalty imposition, considering the short delay and the absence of evidence of intent to contravene the law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>