https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450037 Where a statutory appeal remained pending for an inordinate period after hearing and written submissions, the writ court directed the appellate authority to re-hear the matter and decide it expeditiously within four months. Because coercive recovery steps, including a demand notice and bank-account attachment, were issued on the basis of the adjudication order under challenge while the appeal was still undecided, interim protection was granted. The notice and attachment were stayed until the appeal is decided, and the petitioner was allowed to operate its bank account. The principle stated is that delayed appellate disposal may justify expedited rehearing and interim restraint on recovery measures founded on the impugned order. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:42:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450037 Where a statutory appeal remained pending for an inordinate period after hearing and written submissions, the writ court directed the appellate authority to re-hear the matter and decide it expeditiously within four months. Because coercive recovery steps, including a demand notice and bank-account attachment, were issued on the basis of the adjudication order under challenge while the appeal was still undecided, interim protection was granted. The notice and attachment were stayed until the appeal is decided, and the petitioner was allowed to operate its bank account. The principle stated is that delayed appellate disposal may justify expedited rehearing and interim restraint on recovery measures founded on the impugned order. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450037