<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450035</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld Commissioner&#039;s order partially confirming service tax demand of Rs. 2,15,195 while dropping remaining demand. Tribunal held that manpower supply services to government hospitals, medical colleges, and health centers qualify for exemption under Sr. No. 25(a) of Notification 25/2012-ST as they contribute to public health services. Services to educational institutions were exempted under Sr. No. 9 as auxiliary educational services. Cleaning and housekeeping services to government offices were exempted under sanitation conservancy provisions. Extended limitation period was not applicable as no willful suppression or intent to evade service tax was established. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450035</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld Commissioner&#039;s order partially confirming service tax demand of Rs. 2,15,195 while dropping remaining demand. Tribunal held that manpower supply services to government hospitals, medical colleges, and health centers qualify for exemption under Sr. No. 25(a) of Notification 25/2012-ST as they contribute to public health services. Services to educational institutions were exempted under Sr. No. 9 as auxiliary educational services. Cleaning and housekeeping services to government offices were exempted under sanitation conservancy provisions. Extended limitation period was not applicable as no willful suppression or intent to evade service tax was established. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>