<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1674 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312573</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision after the bar in Section 397(3), and inherent power is reserved for exceptional cases of abuse of process or manifest miscarriage of justice; where the defence needs evidence, the matter must go to trial. In a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a legal notice is to be read as a whole, and if it conveys the cheque particulars and demand on dishonour, no quashing is warranted merely for alleged ambiguity. The challenge to the notice and summoning order therefore failed, and the accused were left to raise their defence before the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1674 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312573</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision after the bar in Section 397(3), and inherent power is reserved for exceptional cases of abuse of process or manifest miscarriage of justice; where the defence needs evidence, the matter must go to trial. In a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a legal notice is to be read as a whole, and if it conveys the cheque particulars and demand on dishonour, no quashing is warranted merely for alleged ambiguity. The challenge to the notice and summoning order therefore failed, and the accused were left to raise their defence before the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>