<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST Refund amendment of section 54(8)(a) impact</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119004</link>
    <description>Amendment substituting &quot;export&quot; for &quot;zero-rated supplies&quot; in the refund provision confines the unjust enrichment exception to exports only, so refunds for supplies to SEZs must be supported by proof that GST was not collected from the SEZ recipient or that the recipient did not claim input tax credit; suppliers should maintain invoices, recipient declarations, and professional certifications as evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:53:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST Refund amendment of section 54(8)(a) impact</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119004</link>
      <description>Amendment substituting &quot;export&quot; for &quot;zero-rated supplies&quot; in the refund provision confines the unjust enrichment exception to exports only, so refunds for supplies to SEZs must be supported by proof that GST was not collected from the SEZ recipient or that the recipient did not claim input tax credit; suppliers should maintain invoices, recipient declarations, and professional certifications as evidence.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:53:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>