<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1171 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450020</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of a charitable organization that was denied exemption under sections 11 and 12 due to failure to upload audit report in Form 10B. The assessee&#039;s auditor had uploaded the form before filing the return, but due to technical software issues, it was neither accepted nor rejected by the system without notification. Upon discovering the error, the assessee uploaded the report and filed for condonation of delay with supporting documentation. The tribunal held that revenue authorities rejected the claim on mere technicalities despite the audit report being ready before the return filing date. Following the Pawan Kumar Agarwal precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A), granting the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1171 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450020</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of a charitable organization that was denied exemption under sections 11 and 12 due to failure to upload audit report in Form 10B. The assessee&#039;s auditor had uploaded the form before filing the return, but due to technical software issues, it was neither accepted nor rejected by the system without notification. Upon discovering the error, the assessee uploaded the report and filed for condonation of delay with supporting documentation. The tribunal held that revenue authorities rejected the claim on mere technicalities despite the audit report being ready before the return filing date. Following the Pawan Kumar Agarwal precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A), granting the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>