<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1159 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450008</link>
    <description>Service tax demand under support services of business and commerce was found unsustainable because, on identical facts in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case, the Tribunal had recorded that no consideration was received for marketing and consignment agency services. Applying that same reasoning, the demand could not stand where no amount had been received towards the alleged taxable service. The impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1159 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450008</link>
      <description>Service tax demand under support services of business and commerce was found unsustainable because, on identical facts in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case, the Tribunal had recorded that no consideration was received for marketing and consignment agency services. Applying that same reasoning, the demand could not stand where no amount had been received towards the alleged taxable service. The impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>