https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450000 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to re-agitate grievances already examined in revision, thereby circumventing the bar on a second revision, unless patent jurisdictional error, abuse of process, mandatory legal non-compliance, or serious miscarriage of justice is shown. No such exceptional basis arose. Interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act is discretionary, subject to a statutory ceiling, and requires reasoned exercise based on the circumstances. Admission of cheque signatures, operation of statutory presumptions, and repeated adjournments attributable to the accused supported the direction for interim compensation. The concurrent orders remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450000 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to re-agitate grievances already examined in revision, thereby circumventing the bar on a second revision, unless patent jurisdictional error, abuse of process, mandatory legal non-compliance, or serious miscarriage of justice is shown. No such exceptional basis arose. Interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act is discretionary, subject to a statutory ceiling, and requires reasoned exercise based on the circumstances. Admission of cheque signatures, operation of statutory presumptions, and repeated adjournments attributable to the accused supported the direction for interim compensation. The concurrent orders remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450000