<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1137 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the confiscation of goods was unsustainable due to a lack of corroborative evidence supporting the alleged illegal export. Consequently, no redemption fine or penalty was imposed. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant consequential relief, as the Revenue failed to substantiate its claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1137 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the confiscation of goods was unsustainable due to a lack of corroborative evidence supporting the alleged illegal export. Consequently, no redemption fine or penalty was imposed. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant consequential relief, as the Revenue failed to substantiate its claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>