<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35924</link>
    <description>Capital gains from the sale of land forming part of a ruler&#039;s official residence were held not to fall within the exemption for the bona fide annual value of palaces declared as official residences. The exemption in paragraph 15(1)(iii) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 was confined to annual value income and could not be extended to capital gains arising on sale of part of the compound. Accordingly, the capital gains were not exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35924</link>
      <description>Capital gains from the sale of land forming part of a ruler&#039;s official residence were held not to fall within the exemption for the bona fide annual value of palaces declared as official residences. The exemption in paragraph 15(1)(iii) of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 was confined to annual value income and could not be extended to capital gains arising on sale of part of the compound. Accordingly, the capital gains were not exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>