https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312563 The Delhi HC held that inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC could not be used to disturb concurrent reasoned orders accepting a cancellation report unless clear illegality, perversity, or abuse of process was shown. On the facts, the material supported the finding that the vehicle had been surrendered, and the petitioner's later payment did not by itself disclose cheating or criminal breach of trust under sections 420 and 406 IPC. As the grounds raised were substantially the same as those already examined below, no jurisdictional error or infirmity was made out, and the complaint could not proceed further. en-us Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:29:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312563 The Delhi HC held that inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC could not be used to disturb concurrent reasoned orders accepting a cancellation report unless clear illegality, perversity, or abuse of process was shown. On the facts, the material supported the finding that the vehicle had been surrendered, and the petitioner's later payment did not by itself disclose cheating or criminal breach of trust under sections 420 and 406 IPC. As the grounds raised were substantially the same as those already examined below, no jurisdictional error or infirmity was made out, and the complaint could not proceed further. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312563