<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2029 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the reassessment and value enhancement of imported goods. The Tribunal concluded that the value enhancement was unjustified, as the assessing officer failed to provide valid reasons or follow proper procedures under Section 14 and Valuation Rules. There was no evidence of related parties or a speaking order for the value enhancement. Consequently, the declared value of the imported Defective/Secondary Misprinted Sheets was accepted, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision and rejecting the Department&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2029 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the reassessment and value enhancement of imported goods. The Tribunal concluded that the value enhancement was unjustified, as the assessing officer failed to provide valid reasons or follow proper procedures under Section 14 and Valuation Rules. There was no evidence of related parties or a speaking order for the value enhancement. Consequently, the declared value of the imported Defective/Secondary Misprinted Sheets was accepted, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision and rejecting the Department&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>