https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312551 A petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to restrain a respondent from travelling abroad was treated as a barred attempt to obtain a second revision after the same grievance had been raised before the Sessions Court. The Court noted that Section 397(2) CrPC prohibits a second revision and found no legal basis to invoke inherent powers on the facts. It accepted that the respondent had roots in India, was employed here, had children studying in India, and was subject to stringent conditions to secure her return. The Court also rejected the attempt to treat her as a substitute for the attendance of other accused persons, and declined interference. en-us Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:51:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312551 A petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to restrain a respondent from travelling abroad was treated as a barred attempt to obtain a second revision after the same grievance had been raised before the Sessions Court. The Court noted that Section 397(2) CrPC prohibits a second revision and found no legal basis to invoke inherent powers on the facts. It accepted that the respondent had roots in India, was employed here, had children studying in India, and was subject to stringent conditions to secure her return. The Court also rejected the attempt to treat her as a substitute for the attendance of other accused persons, and declined interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312551