https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312548 Section 13(1)(g) and Section 13(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 operate independently: the former provides the eviction ground where premises are required for the purposes of a public charitable trust, while the latter imposes a separate comparative hardship inquiry before any decree is passed. The trust-specific amendment to Section 13(1)(g) did not create any express or implied exemption from Section 13(2), and the definition of landlord was treated as including a trustee. Comparative hardship therefore remains relevant even when eviction is sought by a trustee for trust purposes, and the Court must weigh the relative hardship to landlord and tenant before granting relief. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312548 Section 13(1)(g) and Section 13(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 operate independently: the former provides the eviction ground where premises are required for the purposes of a public charitable trust, while the latter imposes a separate comparative hardship inquiry before any decree is passed. The trust-specific amendment to Section 13(1)(g) did not create any express or implied exemption from Section 13(2), and the definition of landlord was treated as including a trustee. Comparative hardship therefore remains relevant even when eviction is sought by a trustee for trust purposes, and the Court must weigh the relative hardship to landlord and tenant before granting relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312548