https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312544 Concurrent findings that the appellant had contracted a second marriage and was guilty under Section 494 IPC were not interfered with, as the issue turned on appreciation of evidence and no perversity or legal infirmity was shown. By contrast, the conviction under Section 498A IPC was set aside because cruelty must be proved by cogent evidence of a continuous or proximate course of conduct, and the record did not establish such statutory cruelty after the complainant left the matrimonial home years earlier. The Court therefore upheld the bigamy conviction but granted relief on the cruelty charge. en-us Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:51:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312544 Concurrent findings that the appellant had contracted a second marriage and was guilty under Section 494 IPC were not interfered with, as the issue turned on appreciation of evidence and no perversity or legal infirmity was shown. By contrast, the conviction under Section 498A IPC was set aside because cruelty must be proved by cogent evidence of a continuous or proximate course of conduct, and the record did not establish such statutory cruelty after the complainant left the matrimonial home years earlier. The Court therefore upheld the bigamy conviction but granted relief on the cruelty charge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312544