<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449978</link>
    <description>HC quashed the assessment order and bank attachment order, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond to the show cause notice, with the tax authority directed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh assessment order within two months. Retained amounts were to be subject to the remanded proceedings&#039; outcome, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449978</link>
      <description>HC quashed the assessment order and bank attachment order, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond to the show cause notice, with the tax authority directed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh assessment order within two months. Retained amounts were to be subject to the remanded proceedings&#039; outcome, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>