<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1127 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449976</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax credit reversal. The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the petitioner to submit relevant refund documents within two weeks. The assessing officer must review the documents and issue a fresh order within two months, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1127 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449976</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax credit reversal. The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the petitioner to submit relevant refund documents within two weeks. The assessing officer must review the documents and issue a fresh order within two months, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>