<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1125 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449974</link>
    <description>The petitioner had joined the investigation in compliance with earlier directions, and the State confirmed that no further custodial interrogation was required. In those circumstances, the interim protection was made absolute and anticipatory bail was confirmed, subject to the petitioner cooperating with any future investigation and complying with the statutory conditions attached to anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1125 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449974</link>
      <description>The petitioner had joined the investigation in compliance with earlier directions, and the State confirmed that no further custodial interrogation was required. In those circumstances, the interim protection was made absolute and anticipatory bail was confirmed, subject to the petitioner cooperating with any future investigation and complying with the statutory conditions attached to anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>