https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449939 Quashing of the predicate offence and the consequential setting aside of money-laundering proceedings did not lead the Supreme Court to decide the merits or the maintainability objection. It noted that the enforcement authority had independent legal remedies, including moving the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and seeking review or clarification before the High Court. Any forum approached was to decide the matter independently, without being influenced by earlier observations. The Court therefore left the parties to pursue available remedies in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:23:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449939 Quashing of the predicate offence and the consequential setting aside of money-laundering proceedings did not lead the Supreme Court to decide the merits or the maintainability objection. It noted that the enforcement authority had independent legal remedies, including moving the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and seeking review or clarification before the High Court. Any forum approached was to decide the matter independently, without being influenced by earlier observations. The Court therefore left the parties to pursue available remedies in accordance with law. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449939