<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1080 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for non-filing of returns under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, amounting to Rs.96,000. The Tribunal determined that the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked, as the show cause notice issued post-CGST Act, 2017 lacked jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was annulled due to procedural irregularities and invalid grounds for the extended period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1080 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for non-filing of returns under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, amounting to Rs.96,000. The Tribunal determined that the extended period of limitation was improperly invoked, as the show cause notice issued post-CGST Act, 2017 lacked jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was annulled due to procedural irregularities and invalid grounds for the extended period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>