https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312537 Pre-arrest protection was granted in a PMLA prosecution after the Court noted the restrictive bail regime under Section 45 but found that the applicant had already been called, his statements recorded, and custodial interrogation was not pressed by the prosecution. Treating the matter as involving serious economic offences, the Court nevertheless held that the existing record justified anticipatory bail. The applicant was protected from arrest on furnishing bonds and was directed to cooperate with the investigation. en-us Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:57:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312537 Pre-arrest protection was granted in a PMLA prosecution after the Court noted the restrictive bail regime under Section 45 but found that the applicant had already been called, his statements recorded, and custodial interrogation was not pressed by the prosecution. Treating the matter as involving serious economic offences, the Court nevertheless held that the existing record justified anticipatory bail. The applicant was protected from arrest on furnishing bonds and was directed to cooperate with the investigation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312537