<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1438 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312531</link>
    <description>Service tax could not be demanded under Business Support Service where the records showed that no amount had been received under the marketing agency agreement. On that factual foundation, the alleged taxable consideration, including reimbursed freight, was absent, so the demand failed and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1438 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312531</link>
      <description>Service tax could not be demanded under Business Support Service where the records showed that no amount had been received under the marketing agency agreement. On that factual foundation, the alleged taxable consideration, including reimbursed freight, was absent, so the demand failed and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>