<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1942 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312527</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the NCDRC&#039;s decision that a Trust cannot file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Act&#039;s definitions of &quot;complainant&quot; and &quot;consumer&quot; do not explicitly include Trusts. Consequently, the Trust&#039;s complaint was deemed non-maintainable, and the appeals were dismissed without addressing the dispute&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1942 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312527</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the NCDRC&#039;s decision that a Trust cannot file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Act&#039;s definitions of &quot;complainant&quot; and &quot;consumer&quot; do not explicitly include Trusts. Consequently, the Trust&#039;s complaint was deemed non-maintainable, and the appeals were dismissed without addressing the dispute&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>