https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312523 Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to obtain bail or anticipatory bail indirectly when the Code provides specific bail remedies. The Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that the request to recall the arrest warrant had become unnecessary because its execution had already been kept in abeyance and the warrant was to be recalled if issued. It further held that repeated non-appearance before the trial court, an unsupported explanation for absence, and withdrawal of an earlier anticipatory bail petition showed deliberate avoidance of process, so the petition was not maintainable as a bypass of the bail provisions. No perversity or illegality was found in the impugned orders, and interference was refused. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:57:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312523 Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to obtain bail or anticipatory bail indirectly when the Code provides specific bail remedies. The Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that the request to recall the arrest warrant had become unnecessary because its execution had already been kept in abeyance and the warrant was to be recalled if issued. It further held that repeated non-appearance before the trial court, an unsupported explanation for absence, and withdrawal of an earlier anticipatory bail petition showed deliberate avoidance of process, so the petition was not maintainable as a bypass of the bail provisions. No perversity or illegality was found in the impugned orders, and interference was refused. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312523