<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35907</link>
    <description>For surtax capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the relevant date remained the first day of the previous year, and the character of a proposed dividend depended on the substance of the company&#039;s accounts and linked transactions. Where the creation of general reserve, proposal of dividend, and later shareholder ratification formed one integrated transaction, the subsequent declaration could relate back to the opening of the accounting year. On that footing, the proposed dividend was not treated as part of the reserve available for capital computation, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was not shown to be unsupported by evidence or perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:33:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35907</link>
      <description>For surtax capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the relevant date remained the first day of the previous year, and the character of a proposed dividend depended on the substance of the company&#039;s accounts and linked transactions. Where the creation of general reserve, proposal of dividend, and later shareholder ratification formed one integrated transaction, the subsequent declaration could relate back to the opening of the accounting year. On that footing, the proposed dividend was not treated as part of the reserve available for capital computation, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was not shown to be unsupported by evidence or perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>