<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1250 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.3,74,85,859, recognizing it as reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, not income. In the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection, the Tribunal confirmed disallowances for personal use of motor car and communication devices but deleted the disallowance for FAX expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1250 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.3,74,85,859, recognizing it as reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, not income. In the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection, the Tribunal confirmed disallowances for personal use of motor car and communication devices but deleted the disallowance for FAX expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>