https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312509 A statute-prescribed mode of appointment prevailed over any implied engagement: continued work, salary payments, or administrative acts could not create a valid appointment where contract employees were excluded by the transitional provision. The teacher therefore had no legal right to continue in service after statutory cessation. A termination based on an enquiry report that had no continuing force under the new statutory regime was invalid to that extent, because adverse reliance on that report was contrary to the statute and stigmatic. However, reinstatement was not sustainable as a matter of right in the absence of a valid subsisting appointment. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312509 A statute-prescribed mode of appointment prevailed over any implied engagement: continued work, salary payments, or administrative acts could not create a valid appointment where contract employees were excluded by the transitional provision. The teacher therefore had no legal right to continue in service after statutory cessation. A termination based on an enquiry report that had no continuing force under the new statutory regime was invalid to that extent, because adverse reliance on that report was contrary to the statute and stigmatic. However, reinstatement was not sustainable as a matter of right in the absence of a valid subsisting appointment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312509