<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449919</link>
    <description>HC set aside an order under Section 73 of CGST Act due to improper notice placement on the web portal. The court found the notice&#039;s location under &#039;Additional Notices&#039; prevented the petitioner from effectively responding. HC granted the petitioner 30 days to submit a response and mandated subsequent adjudication within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449919</link>
      <description>HC set aside an order under Section 73 of CGST Act due to improper notice placement on the web portal. The court found the notice&#039;s location under &#039;Additional Notices&#039; prevented the petitioner from effectively responding. HC granted the petitioner 30 days to submit a response and mandated subsequent adjudication within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>