<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1067 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449916</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case, challenging retrospective cancellation from 01.07.2017. The court modified the cancellation date to 14.08.2019, aligning with the Show Cause Notice date. The ruling emphasized that retrospective registration cancellation must be based on objective criteria and consider potential impacts on input tax credit. The petitioner&#039;s registration was cancelled, with respondents retaining rights to recover any outstanding taxes or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1067 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449916</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case, challenging retrospective cancellation from 01.07.2017. The court modified the cancellation date to 14.08.2019, aligning with the Show Cause Notice date. The ruling emphasized that retrospective registration cancellation must be based on objective criteria and consider potential impacts on input tax credit. The petitioner&#039;s registration was cancelled, with respondents retaining rights to recover any outstanding taxes or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>