<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1062 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449911</link>
    <description>Interim protection against GST recovery was sought where the Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted, and the question was whether such relief could be granted on deposit of the amount contemplated under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC issued notice and directed that, until the next date of hearing, recovery of the balance disputed amount would remain stayed, subject to the petitioner making the deposit required under Section 112(8).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1062 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449911</link>
      <description>Interim protection against GST recovery was sought where the Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted, and the question was whether such relief could be granted on deposit of the amount contemplated under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC issued notice and directed that, until the next date of hearing, recovery of the balance disputed amount would remain stayed, subject to the petitioner making the deposit required under Section 112(8).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>