<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1035 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449884</link>
    <description>The ITAT Raipur examined whether preference shares issued at Rs.110/- per share constituted excess premium under Section 56(2)(viib). The AO rejected the assessee&#039;s Net Asset Value method and applied dividend discounting method, determining FMV at Rs.5/- per share. The ITAT found multiple errors in the AO&#039;s approach: incorrect assumption of redemption value, failure to consider convertibility feature, wrong dividend rate assumption (10% instead of 100%), inappropriate discount rate, and lack of basis for adverse inferences. The matter was remanded to AO for fresh FMV determination considering the tribunal&#039;s observations regarding the optionally convertible redeemable preference shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1035 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449884</link>
      <description>The ITAT Raipur examined whether preference shares issued at Rs.110/- per share constituted excess premium under Section 56(2)(viib). The AO rejected the assessee&#039;s Net Asset Value method and applied dividend discounting method, determining FMV at Rs.5/- per share. The ITAT found multiple errors in the AO&#039;s approach: incorrect assumption of redemption value, failure to consider convertibility feature, wrong dividend rate assumption (10% instead of 100%), inappropriate discount rate, and lack of basis for adverse inferences. The matter was remanded to AO for fresh FMV determination considering the tribunal&#039;s observations regarding the optionally convertible redeemable preference shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>