https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449873 The SC allowed the appellant's bail application in a money laundering case. The appellant surrendered after receiving a summons issued under Section 61, but the Special Court had not passed any order for issuing the summons or warrant. The SC held this was a fundamental procedural flaw, as Section 437 applies only when an accused is arrested, detained, or when summons/warrant is properly issued under Section 204 or other CrPC provisions. Since no valid order existed for the summons, the Special Court incorrectly dismissed the bail application. The appellant was directed to be released on bail with conditions imposed by the Special Court. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449873 The SC allowed the appellant's bail application in a money laundering case. The appellant surrendered after receiving a summons issued under Section 61, but the Special Court had not passed any order for issuing the summons or warrant. The SC held this was a fundamental procedural flaw, as Section 437 applies only when an accused is arrested, detained, or when summons/warrant is properly issued under Section 204 or other CrPC provisions. Since no valid order existed for the summons, the Special Court incorrectly dismissed the bail application. The appellant was directed to be released on bail with conditions imposed by the Special Court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449873