<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1019 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449868</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad disposed of an appeal as infructuous regarding recovery of dues extinguished by a resolution plan approved by NCLT. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant&#039;s own case involving identical issues, where it held that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes Customs should consider issuing guidelines for dealing with cases where IBC proceedings have been initiated against the assessee company. Following this precedent, the current appeal was disposed of on similar grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1019 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449868</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad disposed of an appeal as infructuous regarding recovery of dues extinguished by a resolution plan approved by NCLT. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant&#039;s own case involving identical issues, where it held that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes Customs should consider issuing guidelines for dealing with cases where IBC proceedings have been initiated against the assessee company. Following this precedent, the current appeal was disposed of on similar grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>