<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1013 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449862</link>
    <description>Defective PET chips and PET lumps generated in the ordinary course of manufacture were treated as part of production for SION compliance because the quantities were reflected in statutory returns and records, and Note 2 to the SION was applied as explanatory of the normal production process rather than as a new future-only norm. The extended period of limitation was held unavailable where the relevant data was disclosed in ER-2 and ER-5 returns and the dispute was interpretational, so suppression was not established. The normal-period demand was remanded for fresh quantification after credit for defective production and the SION amendment, and no penalty was to be imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 06:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1013 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449862</link>
      <description>Defective PET chips and PET lumps generated in the ordinary course of manufacture were treated as part of production for SION compliance because the quantities were reflected in statutory returns and records, and Note 2 to the SION was applied as explanatory of the normal production process rather than as a new future-only norm. The extended period of limitation was held unavailable where the relevant data was disclosed in ER-2 and ER-5 returns and the dispute was interpretational, so suppression was not established. The normal-period demand was remanded for fresh quantification after credit for defective production and the SION amendment, and no penalty was to be imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>