<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Conviction Upheld as Presumption Under Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Petitioner.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75090</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - legally enforceable debt or not - The only defence, which has been taken by the petitioner-convict during trial was that the cheques were issued in good faith because of friendship of him with the complainant. - The High Court found that the oral evidence is not rebutted by the petitioner/ accused/ convict by adducing evidence even to rebut the presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act. Though the petitioner/ accused/ convict, in cross-examination of complainant C.W.-1, this question was put up that no income tax return was filed by the complainant; but the same fact is not rebutted by the accused/ convict/ petitioner by adducing evidence in rebuttal. - The revision petition against the order of trial court dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Conviction Upheld as Presumption Under Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Petitioner.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75090</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - legally enforceable debt or not - The only defence, which has been taken by the petitioner-convict during trial was that the cheques were issued in good faith because of friendship of him with the complainant. - The High Court found that the oral evidence is not rebutted by the petitioner/ accused/ convict by adducing evidence even to rebut the presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act. Though the petitioner/ accused/ convict, in cross-examination of complainant C.W.-1, this question was put up that no income tax return was filed by the complainant; but the same fact is not rebutted by the accused/ convict/ petitioner by adducing evidence in rebuttal. - The revision petition against the order of trial court dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>