<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1011 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449860</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a criminal revision petition in a cheque dishonour case. The petitioner-convict admitted signing the cheques but claimed they were given in good faith due to friendship with the complainant. The complainant alleged the cheques were issued to discharge liability for Rs. 20 lakhs paid for land purchase, though the accused later sold the land to another person. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce evidence to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and both trial and appellate court orders were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1011 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449860</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a criminal revision petition in a cheque dishonour case. The petitioner-convict admitted signing the cheques but claimed they were given in good faith due to friendship with the complainant. The complainant alleged the cheques were issued to discharge liability for Rs. 20 lakhs paid for land purchase, though the accused later sold the land to another person. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce evidence to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and both trial and appellate court orders were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>