https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449858 A petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was found not maintainable on the facts presented. The court noted that, under the contractual scheme, claims above the stipulated threshold required constitution of a three-member arbitral tribunal, and the question of commencement could not be treated as arising merely on receipt of the arbitration request. It also observed that the challenge could not be sustained in the manner adopted under Section 11(6), and that the proper remedy had to be pursued before the correct forum under the applicable provision. The request for appointment of an arbitral tribunal was rejected. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449858 A petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was found not maintainable on the facts presented. The court noted that, under the contractual scheme, claims above the stipulated threshold required constitution of a three-member arbitral tribunal, and the question of commencement could not be treated as arising merely on receipt of the arbitration request. It also observed that the challenge could not be sustained in the manner adopted under Section 11(6), and that the proper remedy had to be pursued before the correct forum under the applicable provision. The request for appointment of an arbitral tribunal was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449858