<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1364 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the intra-Court writ appeal as not maintainable, affirming that no appeal lies against an order by a Single Bench in criminal writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized the absence of precedent supporting the maintainability of such appeals, underscoring the necessity for rule clarity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1364 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the intra-Court writ appeal as not maintainable, affirming that no appeal lies against an order by a Single Bench in criminal writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized the absence of precedent supporting the maintainability of such appeals, underscoring the necessity for rule clarity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>