https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508 An intra-court writ appeal does not lie against a Single Judge's order passed in criminal writ jurisdiction under Article 226, because the distinction between civil and criminal writ proceedings controls maintainability and the Gauhati High Court Rules contain no enabling provision for such an appeal. Authorities cited by the appellant were treated as procedurally distinct and not determinative of the maintainability question. Applying the Supreme Court principle that a Letters Patent Appeal, or its equivalent, is unavailable from an order rendered in criminal jurisdiction, the Court concluded that the intra-court remedy was not maintainable. en-us Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508 An intra-court writ appeal does not lie against a Single Judge's order passed in criminal writ jurisdiction under Article 226, because the distinction between civil and criminal writ proceedings controls maintainability and the Gauhati High Court Rules contain no enabling provision for such an appeal. Authorities cited by the appellant were treated as procedurally distinct and not determinative of the maintainability question. Applying the Supreme Court principle that a Letters Patent Appeal, or its equivalent, is unavailable from an order rendered in criminal jurisdiction, the Court concluded that the intra-court remedy was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312508