https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312507 The HC noted that Section 482 CrPC preserves inherent power only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and cannot be used to bypass the express bar on a second revision under Section 397(3). Where a petition is, in substance, a second revision after revisional jurisdiction has already been exercised by the Sessions Judge, it is not maintainable unless rare and exceptional circumstances show grave miscarriage of justice or clear abuse of process. On the facts, no such exceptional circumstance was shown, so the challenge to the framing of charge failed and the criminal writ petition was dismissed, leaving the trial proceedings undisturbed. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312507 The HC noted that Section 482 CrPC preserves inherent power only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and cannot be used to bypass the express bar on a second revision under Section 397(3). Where a petition is, in substance, a second revision after revisional jurisdiction has already been exercised by the Sessions Judge, it is not maintainable unless rare and exceptional circumstances show grave miscarriage of justice or clear abuse of process. On the facts, no such exceptional circumstance was shown, so the challenge to the framing of charge failed and the criminal writ petition was dismissed, leaving the trial proceedings undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312507