<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2147 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312503</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order discharging the accused under Section 302 IPC, finding the HC&#039;s premature evaluation of evidence improper. The SC emphasized that the HC improperly exercised its revisional power by analyzing evidence at the discharge stage, which should be reserved for trial. The appeals were allowed, and the case will proceed to trial without any assessment on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2147 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312503</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order discharging the accused under Section 302 IPC, finding the HC&#039;s premature evaluation of evidence improper. The SC emphasized that the HC improperly exercised its revisional power by analyzing evidence at the discharge stage, which should be reserved for trial. The appeals were allowed, and the case will proceed to trial without any assessment on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>