https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312501 SC held that G.O. Ms. 124 dated 7th March, 2002 is prospective and not applicable to selection processes started pursuant to 1999 advertisement. State Government lacked power under Presidential Order 1975 to pass retrospective orders regarding reservation in selection procedures. Once selection procedure commences, procedural law amendments cannot be applied retrospectively. HC correctly ruled that existing appointments between 2001-2002 remain unaffected but erred in directing application of 2002 G.O. to pending selections. Remaining vacant posts must be filled per Presidential Order 1975 and prevailing government orders from 1999. Appeal allowed. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312501 SC held that G.O. Ms. 124 dated 7th March, 2002 is prospective and not applicable to selection processes started pursuant to 1999 advertisement. State Government lacked power under Presidential Order 1975 to pass retrospective orders regarding reservation in selection procedures. Once selection procedure commences, procedural law amendments cannot be applied retrospectively. HC correctly ruled that existing appointments between 2001-2002 remain unaffected but erred in directing application of 2002 G.O. to pending selections. Remaining vacant posts must be filled per Presidential Order 1975 and prevailing government orders from 1999. Appeal allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312501